Review Article
Introduction:
Ovarian Cancer(OC) portrays the third most frequently encounteredgynaecolgical malignancies, of the female reproductive system,whosediagnosis had been made as well as possesses greater mortality rates offull gynaecolgical tumor spectrum [1]. In view of itspernicious characteristics at the time of earlier stages, maximum of patients with OC get diagnosis made at substantially advancement stage of the OC to start with at the time when primary debulking surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapies are not devoid of their inimical sequelae which has been a well displayed fact inclusive of recurrencerates, metastasis, resistanceto chemotherapy, thereby OCisassociated with substantially greater mortality rates[2]. In view of the escalating incidence in each year with escalating young persons generating OC [3,], the requirement of generating innovative methodologies in addition tobiomarkers which might aid in earlier determination along with greaterefficacious therapies subsequent to diagnosis is assuming considerable significance [4].
Ferroptosis portrays a kind of cell demise, unique from other kinds of programmed cell death for instan ceapoptosis, autophagy in addition to necroptosis where ROS along with lipid peroxides (LPO) accrual get generated by iron metabolism as well as their for generating fatal toxicity in view of cells are not capable of metabolizing the min a smooth manner[5]. Whereas canonicaltreatments generally deplete tumor cells by stimulating cell death for generation of resistanceit has assumed considerable significance for scientific researchers for cancer treatment, acknowledged its part in controlling cell demise [6]. Variable studies have illustrated that ferroptosis is correlated with resistance to cancer therapies, which might beplausibly involved in aiding in reverting resistance to cancertherapies [7]. Once further advancements ofscientific research occurred invention of ferroptosis proved tobecrucial in plethora of variety of diseases inclusive of Breast cancer (BC),pancreaticcancer, neurological diseases, cardiovascular disease(CVD) alongwith kidney diseases,and others[8].Of these,ferroptosis is maximum intricately correlated withmalignant tumors in addition totumor cells possesspronouncedsensitivityto ferroptosis[9]. Ferroptosis possesses the capability of controlling the generation of OC via variable mechanistic modesor etiological factors, therefore escalates the sensitivity of OC cells towards ferroptosis targeted therapeutics, as well as taking care of chemotherapy resistance [10],therefore escalating the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of OC [11]. Furthermore, a correlated study has displayed that the fashion of immune infiltration in addition to correlated genetic characteristic of ferroptosis, plausibly might be used for anticipation of prognosis of OC cases [12]. Utilization of combination of ferroptosis with chemotherapy, nanotechnology, X-raytherapy along with photo dynamic therapy have been displayed to result in improvement of therapeutic effectiveness[13], that yield plausible targets as well as generating innovative therapeutic trajectories for ferroptosis in reference to OC management.
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stressis implicated in lipidmetabolism, controlling of Ca2+ , in addition toprocessing of protein, their folding along withtransportation, thatportrays a significant organelle in case of eukaryotic cells[14]. ERstress (ERS)gets stimulated in cells by hypoxic situations,ii)geneticmutations,iii) insufficiency of nutrients as well as iv)oxidative stress( OS), that resultsin accrual ofmisfolded in addition to unfolded proteins in thelumen ofER causing activation of the unfolded protein responses(UPR) for taking care of the external milieu, which isunattractive[15]. Nevertheless, sustenance of greater magnitude of ERS leads to cell demise, once threshold for tolerance of ERS gets crossed[16], possesses the capability of resultingin generation of variable diseases forinstance cancer, atherosclerosis, diabetic retinopathy, in addition toischaemic nephropathy[17]. The inimical tumor microenvironment( TME) for tumor cells in view of greater metabolic needalong withOS,of rest disrupts ERhomeostasis in the immune cellsthat has the capability of influencing protection conferring anticancer immunity[18]. Yan et al. [19], illustrated that targeting the germane pathways in ERS are capable of hampering the proliferation of OC cells along with decrease chemotherapy resistance[19]. Thereby ERS is crucial in the formation as well as forOS therapy.
Different studies have illustrated that ferroptosis in addition to ERS possess theakin controlling pathways, along with the two possess the capacity of changing the generation of variable diseases by crosstalking witheach other[20-22].
Earlierwe reviewed the cell death mechanisms as plausible therapeutictargets for BC, role of melatonin as a future prospective therapyfor treating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD) bytargeting hepatic ferroptosis ,and its part in treating diabetic kidney disease(DKD) [23-25]. Here we further update themechanistic modes of ferroptosis along with ERSin OS as well asthe plausiblegermaneness of the twoof them for emphasizing the generation of innovative approaches in addition to plausibletargetsforOC therapy .
Methods
Here we conducted a narrative review utilizing search engine pubmed,google scholar ;web of science ;embase;Cochrane reviewlibraryutilizingthe MeSH termslike endoplasmic reticulum stress(ERS); ovarian cancer(OC); unfolded protein responses(UPR); ferroptosis; glutathioneperoxidase 4 (GPX4); lipid peroxidation; Divalent metal transporter(DMT); Ferritin ; Oxidative stress( OS); Ferritinophagy ; AMPK; nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor-2((Nrf2) /Kelch-like-epichlorohydrin (ECH)-associated protein 1 (KEAP1); Herbal products; curcumin analogs ; melatonin from2000 to 2025 till date.
Results
We found a total of 2000 articles out of which we selected190 articles for this review.No meta-analysis was done.
2. Ferroptosis in case of OC
Ferroptosis portrays a kind of programmed cell death that possesses the properties of escalated accrual of iron, lipidantioxidation along with lipid peroxidation [26]. OC casesgenerally display chemotherapy resistance which is intricately associated with ferroptosis[27].
2.1 Iron metabolism in case of OC
Iron portrays one of the imperative trace elements that possess significant part in human growth as well asgeneration, energy metabolism in addition to working of the immune system[28]. Aberrations of the iron metabolism influenceredox reactions,ii) genecontrolling,iii) enzymatic reactions iv) DNA generation in addition to healing[29]. Iron possesses complicated nature along with comprehensive circulating mechanisticmodes for guaranteeing its appropriate organization, utility as well asstorage for sustenance of precise in addition to nontoxic cellular iron quantities in human body [30]. Existence of iron in human body is in the form of 2 kinds off erric iron (Fe 3+) along with Fe 2+, as well as there is presence of variable transporters/ modes based on variable iron kinds. Dietary iron ingestion/day is inclusive of haem iron in addition tononhaem iron[31]. Once they reach theintestinal lumen in the form of Fe 3+ their reduction takes place to Fe 2+,by duodenal cytochrome- B fortheir absorption,where nonhaem iron absorption takes place in the intestine through divalent metal transporter(DMT)1 protein [32] . Transportation of heme iron subsequently takes place to duodenal epithelium through haem protein 1 followed by itsabsorption, internalization, degradationinto Fe 2+, in addition to hemeoxygenase-1(HO1) [33]. Following that iron might continue to stay in theenterocytes or gain entry into the blood stream from basolateral membrane of the intestinal epithelial cells through membrane iron transporter protein 1, whereas undergoingoxidation byferrousoxidaseorceruloplasmin for forming Fe 3+[34]. On gaining entry into the blood stream, plasma transferrin(TF) guarantees precise organization of Fe 3+ right through the cells of human body for utilizationby variable organs for forming iron possessing constituents via TF receptor(TFR) modulatedholoTF endocytoses [35].For instance, hepaticgeneration of hemosiderin takes place, whereas myoglobin gets generated in the muscle tissue, with the Bone marrow contributing to thedevelopmentof the redblood cells(RBC) possessinghaemoglobin. Iron uptake gets facilitated in cells basically via the TF along with TFR systems, as well as Fe 3+ gets reduced to Fe2+,by ferric oxidereductase, whosebinding takes place to ferritin, to generate storage iron, with the little percentage gaining entry into thecytoplasm which overallcontributes to the labile ironpool(LIP) [36]. In view of instability in addition to greater susceptibility to oxidation of Fe 2+, escalated iron ions causethe generation of reactive oxygen species(ROS) , thatfacilitates lipid peroxidation via the Fenton reaction[37], therefore resultingin oxidative injury to the lipid membranes, proteins along with DNA eventually resultingin cell demise[38]. Out of the 3 mechanistic modes of ferroptosis,escalated accrual of Fe 2+, in the LIP iron escalates the sensitivity of cells to ferroptosis as well as portray the starting constituents implicated inferroptosis generation[36].
The starting step of ferroptosis has notbeen isolated till now, however ferroptosis has been intricately associated with the intracellular quantities of free iron[39].Iron metabolismworksin the form ofa crucial pathophysiology of OC, in addition to the magnitude of intracellular iron accrual functions as possessing amajor part in the time period of OC[40]. Concomitantly aberrations in the iron metabolism, particularly the attaining of iron accrual along with sustenance of enhancediron aid in theevent of tumorigenesis as well astumorgrowth[41]. Iron accrualescalatesthe riskofgenerationofdiseases forinstance cancer in addition to injury to tissues[42]. Thereby sustenance of intracellulariron ions homeostasis is crucial.As per Basuli etal. [43], OC starting cells, display greater iron reliance. Escalated iron export further diminished the proliferation along with invasion of OC starting cells as well as on the other hand,escalated iron uptake escalatesOC proliferation along with invasion[43]. Starting of high grade serous ovarian cancers(HGSOC) canonically occursfrom thefallopian tubes with diagnosis usually postponed till FIGOstageIII-IV in view of its asymptomatic presentation,in addition to iron quantities of HGSOC have been found to be correlated with greater in contrast to low grade serous Ovarian Cancer (LGSOC), pointing that HGSOC along with iron metabolism are robustly correlated [44]. Additionally, the malignant conversion as well asmetastasis of cancer cells are intricately correlated with alterations of cellularredox status[45]. The molecular injury resulting from escalated quantities of inimical reactive oxygen species(ROS) ROS which gets catalyzed by free iron is usually knownas ‘’oxidative injury’’ as well as Bauckman etal. [46], displayed that ROS possesses the capability of conversion normal ovarian by facilitating the mitogen activated protein kinase(MAPK) pathway. Apart fromthat ROS possess the capacity of hydroxylating DNA residues for the formation of substantially mutagenic 8 hydroxy-2’ deoxy guanosine(8OHdG),whose quantities have been observed to be correlated with badprognosis in case of HGSOC patients[47]. Binding of iron polyporphyrinheme occurswith p53, that resultsin disturbance of p53-DNA crosstalk, that results in nuclear export as well as cellularbreakdown of p53 in addition toescalated proneness to HGSOC[48]. Basuli etal. [43],reported that escalated iron concurrently influenced tumor cell proliferation, metabolism along with metastasis. Enhancing the expression of ferroportin on cell membranes [49], diminishing iron consumption[50],or diminishing the quantities of TF[51], along with TFR in vivo [52], possesses the capability of hampering tumor growth . Apart fromthat iron metabolism has the capacity of generating OC by controlling Hypoxia inducible factor1α(HIF 1α). HIF 1αstimulates the propagation of OC byhampering the working of p53, facilitating Interleukin (IL-6) expression, or getting controlled by Longnon coding RNAs(lnc RNAs) [53]. Iron metabolism further is intricately associated with chemotherapy resistance as well as solutecarrier familygeneration40members 1 (SLC40A1), that is an iron metabolism associatedgene, portrayingthelone acknowledgedgene that exports iron[54],thatpossesses a critical part in the transportation of iron from the intracellular milieu to the extracellular milieu, thereby physiological expression of SLC40A1 possesses a critical part in the controlling of iron homeostasis. SLC40A1 stimulated iron overload resultsin cisplatin chemotherapy resistance in OC[55]. SLC40A1 upregulation diminishes cisplatin resistance by iron export, diminishing intracellular iron quantities in addition to OS. In contrast to that escalated iron quantities along with OS resulting fromSLC40A1 downregulationescalates cisplatin resistance[55]. Thereby modulation of iron quantities for affecting redox systems might be a plausible approach for reverting chemotherapy resistance in OC.
Theiron based quality of OC tumor starting cells further escalates their sensitivity to ferroptosis in addition to ironchelators, which yieldthemas plausible therapeutic targets for OC therapy [56].A natural ironchelatordesferrioxamine[72], has beenutilized for iron overload, has demonstrated favourableoutcomesfor OC therapy.Wang etal. [57],investigated the actions of desferrioxamine on OC cancer cell lines as well as their observations were that desferrioxamine apart from hamperingcancerstem cells, they further escalated effectivenessofcisplatin chemotherapy, resultedin improvementof chemotherapy resistance along withcontinuation of time ofsurvival. Furthermore, there is proof of other agents whichcontrol iron metabolism as well as might possess actions on other biological events. Forinstance the antimalarialdrug artemisinin, has been recognized forits antimalarial, anti inflammatory in addition to anti tumor actions in addition to its compounds(forinstance artemisunate) possesses the capability of diminishing cell proliferation as well as stimulate ROS generation in the OC cells[58]. Artemisunate has the capability of activatinglysosomal working ,resultingin facilitating breakdown of ferritin, resultingin liberation of iron in lysosomes, therefore modulatingcell demise[59]. Controllers, inclusive of iron uptake associatedcontrollers[60], iron storage associatedcontrollers[61], along with iron transportation associatedcontrollers[62], impact the events of OC via the controlling of iron metabolism quantities.
2.2 Lipid peroxidation in case of OC
Ferroptosis portrays a kind ofcell demise, unique from other kinds of programmed cell death forinstanceapoptosis, autophagy in addition to necroptosis resulting from membrane lipid peroxidation along with considerable accrual of ROS[63]. Additionally,membrane lipids possess a significant part in the controlling of the fateof cell as well as lipid metabolism thatiselemental in estimating the fateofferroptosis[64], in addition to is crucial forimplementation offerroptosis.
Out of the different lipids , polyunsaturated fatty acids(PUFA), along with variable phospholipids(PL’s) forinstance phosphatidylethanolamine (PE ), as well asphosphatidyl cholineare implicated in lipid peroxidation in case of ferroptosis .PL’s thatpossess PUFA’s have greater proneness for oxidation, however lesser oxidizable saturated fatty acids /monounsaturated fatty acids conferred protection to the cell from ferroptosis[65]. Thereby the enzymes along with pathways implicated in controlling PUFA’s in addition to monounsaturated fatty acids metabolism, apart from equilibrium of PUFA’s in addition to monounsaturated fatty acids in membrane PL’s, are capable of affectingcellular sensitivity to ferroptosis[66]. The observations of the above-mentionedfact yieldsinnovative approach for the therapy of lipid peroxidation in case of OC ferroptosis. In view of membrane PL’s of PUFA’s which guideROS generation catalyzed by iron ions, crosstalk with PUFA’s are implicated in stimulating lipid peroxidation that resultsincellular ferroptosis, as well asnotjustby free PUFA’s by themselves, the enzymes which are involved in the binding of the free PUFA’s to PL’s, possess a critical partin ferroptosis[66]. Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4) portrays animperative constituent of ferroptosis achievement, the manner displayed by microarray evaluationof cell lines with resistanceto ferroptosis along with utilization of genome wide clustered regularly Interspersed shortpalindromic repeats nuclease(s) (CRISPR) dependent screening system[67]. ACSL4 catalyzes free long chain fatty acids(LCFAs) to Acyl-CoA by associating them with CoA.Inserting Acyl-CoA into membrane PL’s followed by binding to the PE to generate PUFA’s PL’s ,gets catalyzed by the enzymelysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 3 (LPC AT3) [68].In reference to mechanistic modes,2 basically modesareimplicated i) non enzymatic spontaneousoxidation as well asii) enzymes modulated lipid peroxidation[69], leading to the formation of phospholipid-peroxide (PL-OOH) in addition to once converting of PL-OOH does not takes place to phospholipidhydroxide (PL-OH ) by antioxidantsin the required time it leadsto considerable accrual of PL-OOH, which resultsin considerable lipid peroxidation along with activation of the antioxidant system, stimulating injury to the cell membrane, eventually resultingincell impairment as well as ferroptosis[70]. Non enzymatic lipid peroxidation alias lipid autooxidation represents free radicals guided chain reactions . Reaction of hydrogenperoxide(H2O2)with Fe2+, resultsin theformation ofhydroxyl radical (OH)-* , whose reaction takes place with PUFA’s in the plasma membrane(PM) in the Fenton reaction for generating lipidperoxides (LPO) resulting in ferroptosis[71,72]. Therebyescalated accrual of LPO is imperative for escalating the effectiveness of ferroptosis [73], in addition to OH-*portray themaximumactive ROS [74], therebyit works in the form of an innovative therapeutic target forthe OC treatment through chemodynamic therapy(CDT). H2O2 nano enzymes generated in cells by Sun etal. [75], by utilization of CoNi alloysencapsulated nitrogen doped carbonnanotubes displayed glucose oxidase as well as lactate oxidaseactions for efficaciously interfering with the antioxidant defense system by catalyzing the OH-*generation, escalating the ROS quantities in the tumor microenvironment( TME) in addition toinjuring tumor cells, whereas eliminatingglutathione(GSH) for stimulating ferroptosis in the tumor cells[90]. Liang etal. [76], illustratedpoly dopamine(PDA)- modulated Michael additionin combination with Fe 2+- elimination of GSH, escalated accrual of OH-*, eventually led to escalated intracellular liberation of chemotherapeuticagent Doxorubicin (DOX), thereby stimulating ferroptosis [76]. Additionally,lipid peroxidationis robustlyassociated with variable metabolic along with signaling pathways forinstance cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase(POR) pathway as well as enzymes which possessiron inclusive of lipooxygenases(LOX) further aids in lipid peroxidation[77]. On the other hand, enzymatic lipid peroxidation representsan event that directly implicates oxidation of free PUFA’s into different kinds of lipidhydroperoxides catalyzed by LOX[78]. Out of these, the arachidonate familylipooxygenase(ALOX) control lipid peroxidation. Binding of5 LOX to the microsomal GSH-S transferase 1resultedin diminishedlipid peroxidation in addition to modulated ferroptosis in the cancer cells[79]. On the other hand, Chu etal. [80], found that ALOX12 (alias LOX12) manipulated lipid peroxidation was involved in p53 based ferroptotic reactions in case ofROS stimulated stress [80], whereas the expression quantities of arachidonate family 15 lipooxygenase (ALOX15), are correlated with spermidine/spermine acetyltransferase (SAT1) gene, a transcriptional target of p53[81]. Zhang etal. [82], illustrated that the chemotherapeutic agents for OC stimulated escalated lipid peroxidation via ROS starting ovarian cells ferroptosis, thereby resulting in ovarian cell demise [82].Asper Xuetal. [83], p53 works in the form of a significant factor in the ferroptosis event [83]. p53 displays bidirectional controlling actions dependent on particular situations ofencompassing milieu. In case of lesser quantities of lipid peroxidation p53 hampers the event of ferroptosis, facilitating cell survival. Nevertheless, on continuation of escalated lipid peroxidation, ferroptosis is stimulated [83].
Taken together, future studies on the actions of variable lipid metabolic pathways regarding lipid peroxidation along with regarding ferroptosis from the point of view of chemotherapy stimulated OS as well asferroptosis might aid in regulating ovarian injury, causing improvementof quality of life (QOL) of OC patients might aid in gettinginsight regarding ferroptosis in addition to therapeutic OC.
2.3 Lipid antioxidation in case of OC
Oxidative injury takes place in view of disequilibrium amongst cellularantioxidant system with thegeneration of the free radicals in addition to neutralization or depletion of their inimical actions. ROS modulated lipid peroxidation, portrays a critical step in guidingcellular ferroptosis along withinactivation of antioxidant system portrays the basic etiological factor of ferroptosis[84]. Currently it has been illustrated that the basic antioxidant system controlling ferroptosis is inclusive of i) System Xc (-) -glutathione (GSH) -glutathione peroxidase4(GPX4) pathwayii) ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1)/ - coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) pathwayiiI) GTPcyclohydrolase1(GCH1)- Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) pathway IV)dihydroorotate dehydrogenase(DHODH) -CoQH2 pathway. Out of these,System Xc (-) -glutathione(GSH) -glutathioneperoxidase4(GPX4) pathway portrays the maximum elemental antioxidant system that possesses the crucial part in conferringprotection ferroptosis[85].Figure 1yields asummaryof basic antioxidant system controlling ferroptosis[rev in ref 86].
Legend forFigure1
Courtesy reference no-86Primary antioxidant systems regulating ferroptosis. System Xc−-GSH-GPX4: Cystine is oxidized to cysteine through the System Xc-, which leads to the synthesis of GSH, and GPX4 reduces PLOOH to PLOH with the participation of GSH, which induces the onset of ferroptosis when GPX4 is inhibited. FSP1-CoQ10-NADPH: FSP1 promotes the transfer of CoQ10 from mitochondria to the cell membrane by myristoylation of the N-terminus with the participation of CoQ10 and its reduction to CoQ10H2 catalyzed by NADPH, which prevents cellular ferroptosis by trapping free radicals. GCH1-BH4-DHFR: GCH1 is the rate-limiting enzyme for the biosynthesis of BH4. BH4 acts as a free radical-trapping antioxidant, inhibiting ferroptosis. It is recycled by DHFR and subjected to redox cycling. DHODH-CoQ10H2: DHODH is located on the outer surface of the inner mitochondrial membrane and inhibits cellular ferroptosis by reducing lipid reactive oxygen species in mitochondria by reducing CoQ10 to CoQ10H2. Supplementation with DHODH substrates or products (DHO or OA) regulates cellular ferroptosis. BH2, dihydrobiopterin; BH4, tetrahydrobiopterin; CoQ10, CoQ10, coenzyme Q10; CoQ10H2, ubiquinol-10; DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; DHO, dihydroorotate; DHODH, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase; FSP1, ferroptosis suppressor protein 1; GCH1, guanosine triphosphate cyclohydrolase 1; GSH, glutathione; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; OA, orotate; PLOH, phospholipid hydroxide; PLOOH, phospholipid hydroperoxide; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; SLC3A2, solute carrier family 3 member 2; SLC7A11, solute carrier family 7 member 11.
2.3.A- System Xc (-) -glutathione (GSH) -glutathioneperoxidase4(GPX4) pathway-
This possesses the crucial part regarding antioxidant defence mechanistic modes of ferroptosis. System Xc (-)portrays a cystine- glutamate reverse transporterreceptor) protein that is constituted ofa dimer of solutecarrier familygeneration7member 11 (SLC7A11), along with SLC3A2 that has placement on the cell membrane[85]. System Xc (-) oxidizes intracellular cystine to cysteine that further causes transformation to GSH [87]. In contrastGPX4, confers protection to the cells against ferroptosis by diminishing PL-OOH transformation to PL-OH which has no toxicity, that implicatesGSH(the reducingcofactor for GPX4) [88]. Hampering of GPX4 stimulateslipid ROS as well as stimulated starting offerroptosis, therefore hampering tumor cells proliferation[90].
Studies have illustrated that erastin[27], sorafenib[91],sulfasalanazine[92], in addition to p53[93], hadthe capacity of generating GSH stimulateferroptosis by hampering System Xc. Metallothionen-1Gportrays a crucial factor as well as plausible therapeutictarget for controlling sorafenib resistance in human hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) . Downregulation of metallothionen-1G escalated lipid peroxidation along with GSH elimination ,resultingin ferroptosis in HCC[91]. Utilization of an innovative strategy was done by Yuan etal. [94], byusing a combination of chemotherapy as well as chemodynamic-therapy, that hampered malignant cells proliferation by inactivation of GPX4 by stimulating GSH elimination, in addition to astrategy that illustrated extensive magnitude of biosafety. Luo etal. [95], observed that paired box8( PAX8- that portrays a GPX4 based OC prone gene) elimination, resulted in escalated sensitivity to GPX4 hampering agents. A combination of PAX8 hampering agents in addition to RSL3, hampered proliferation along with stimulated ferroptosis inOC cells[95]. Apart fromt hat, System Xc (-) - GSH) - (GPX4) pathway portrays a crucial antioxidant system, causing avoidance of lipid peroxidation modulated ferroptosis as well as blockade of such pathway facilitate the initiation of ferroptosis in stimulating chemotherapeutic resistance[96]. Okuno etal. [97], displayed that System Xc (-)portrays a transporter that is implicated in cystine in addition to glutamate transport possesses a controlling part in intracellular GSH quantities along with cisplatin resistance in OCcelllines[97].Their outcomes illustrated that OC cells in the cisplatinresistant variant possessed a4.5 time greater cystine uptake as well as intracellular GSH quantities in contrast to OCcelllines in view of their attaining cystine transporteraction that gotmodulated by System Xc (-):nevertheless, the GSH quantities diminishedsubsequent to glutamate over dosage . Cystine uptake was further hampered. Thereby it gets pointed that System Xc (-)possesses a significant partin the sustenance of greater GSH quantities in addition to hasthe capacity of conferring cisplatin resistance in OC celllines. Apart fromthat, a study has illustrated that liberation of GSH along with cysteine in case ofOC fibroblasts aid in the diminishing of nuclear accrual of platinum[97]. Furthermore, CD8+T cells are capable of hampering resistance by controlling GSH as well as cysteine metabolism in fibroblasts[98].
Collectively, these suggest that hampering of System Xc, elimination of GSH in addition to diminishing of GPX4, together modulate metabolic events that are implicated in amino acids which escalate sensitivity to ferroptosis hampering agents, as well as targeting such systems might have the capacity of reverting chemotherapeutic resistance in addition to diminish the OC propagation.
2.3.B Ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1)/ - coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) pathway
Bersuker etal. [99], isolated FSP in the form of arobust resistance factorto ferroptosis, indicating that FSP- CoQ10- nicotinamide adenine nucleotide phosphate(NADPH )pathway is independent of the canonical System Xc- GSH- GPX4 pathway, emphasizingone extra pathway implicated inantioxidant controlling of ferroptosis, pointing that its pharmacological hampering might escalate sensitivity of cancer cells to ferroptosis stimulating chemotherapeutic agents. FSP1 portrays a crucial protein which results in avoidance of cells going through ferroptosis, along with FSP1 knock out (KO) escalate sensitivity cell lines toferroptosis stimulating agents in addition to in the form of a controller of mitochondrial apoptosis. Enrollment of FSP1 takes place toPM, through myristoylation (a fatty acid modification acknowledged to work in membrane targeting), therefore hampering ferroptosis[99,100]. Basically FSP1 iscorrelated with outer mitochondrial membrane(OMM) as well asgoesthrough myristoylation, at the N terminalend for facilitating transportation of CoQ10 from mitochondria to the cell membrane. The reduction of CoQ10 to the Ubiquinol (CoQ10H2) leads to trapping of the free radicals, modulating lipid peroxidation, in addition to thereby avoidance of ferroptosis of cells[99]. Additionally,ithas been illustrated that subsequenttoStearoylCoA desaturase 1 downregulation, diminishing of lipophilic antioxidant CoQ10, that stimulatesthe plausibility for ferroptosis by hampering intracellular formation of lipids that confersprotection . Hampering of StearoylCoA desaturase 1 escalated the antitumor actions of ferroptosis stimulators in case of OCcelllines. Combination of StearoylCoA desaturase 1 hampering agents with the ferroptosis stimulators might yieldan innovative approach for the treatment of OC[101]. The small molecule hampering agent FIN56 hampers CoQ10formation in the mevalonate pathwaysubsequenttobinding followed by activation of squalene synthase leadingto diminished CoQ10 quantities, therefore escalating ferroptosis sensitivity [102].
Yang etal. [103], generated nanogels that escalated cellularlipid peroxidation via hampering FSP- CoQ10- NADPH pathway, resultingin ferroptosis of immunogeniccells along with leadingto efficacious tumor attrition as well as immune reactions in mouse model of breast cancer. Furthermore, FSP1 downregulation inHCC facilitated sorafenib stimulated ferroptosis [104].
Thereby, FSP- CoQ10- NADPH )pathway, might becomplementary as well as act with the System Xc GSH- GPX4 pathway for hampering lipid peroxidation in ferroptosis, yielding plausible therapeutic approach for the treatment of OC .
2.3.C. GCH1)- BH4- dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) pathway-
An earlier study isolated the GCH1- BH4- DHFR pathway in the form of alternative complementary mechanistic mode for System Xc - GSH- GPX4 pathway [105]. GCH1 portrays a rate restricting enzyme regarding BH4 generation, that facilitates ferroptosis through the metabolites BH4 in addition to dihydrobiopterin (BH2). BH4 in the form of free radicals trapping antioxidant, is capable of getting recycled by DHFR for redoxcycling, along with BH4 possesses the capability of antioxidant breaking down actionson phospholipids(PL’s), thatpossesstwo PUFA tails as well asavoidance of lipid peroxidation in addition to thereby ferroptosis by hampering the generation of LPO’s[105].
Viadirect trapping of antioxidant free radicals along with generation of CoQ10[105], once GCH1 upregulation takes place,it facilitates BH4 generationas well asmitigates the inimical actionsof RSL3 stimulated cellular ferroptosis. Furthermore, GCH1 overexpression has been illustrated to diminish the sensitivity of cancer cells that have chemotherapy resistance to ferroptosis, that inturn further attenuated propagation of ferroptosis of cancer cells via controllingof CoQ10 [106].
Apart from that, germane studies have illustratedinvolvementof BH4 in dopamine generation, nitric oxide synthase (NOS), as well as melatonin[107], while exogenous dopamine or melatonin , hadthe capacity ofhampering ferroptosis[108]. Variable studies have illustrated that nitric oxide (NO), possesses the capability of hampering ferroptosis in tumor cells based encompassingmilieu[109,110]. DHFR diminishes BH2 in cells viaimplicatingNADPH , therefore facilitating generation of BH4. In case ofhampering ofDHFR, tumor cells ferroptosisgets facilitatedthrough synergistic actions of GPX4 hampering agents[72].
Thereby the GCH1- BH4- DHFR pathway possesses crucial part regarding controlling equilibrium amongst oxidative injury in addition toantioxidant defense at the time of ferroptosis along with crosstalks with the System Xc GSH- GPX4 pathway as well as FSP- CoQ10- NADPH pathway in a synergisticor complementary fashion. Despite, other mechanistic modes as well as plausible therapeutictargets continue tobe estimated, the isolated plausible therapeutictargets mightbeutilizedfor getting chemotherapeutic resistance in case of OC.
2.3.D. Mitochondrial dihydroorotate dehydrogenase(DHODH) -CoQ10H2 pathway. DHODH- CoQ10H2 pathway
Themitochondrial DHODH- CoQ10H2 pathway in addition toFSP- CoQ10- NADPH pathway portray thetwo main lipid antioxidant systems in mitochondria. In case of hampering ofone of the systems, the cell generates greater dependance onthe other antioxidant systems, along with once hampering ofbothsystemsoccur ,mitochondrial lipid peroxidation takes place, leadingto ferroptosis[110].
CoQH2, portrays free radicals trapping antioxidantpossessing antiferroptotic actions. DHODH placement is onthe outer surface of innermitochondrial membrane(IMM), as well ashampers ferroptosis by transformation of CoQ10 to CoQ10H2 for diminishing lipidsin mitochondria. Dihydroorotate/orotate/ substratesorDHODHproductssupplementation mitigated/escalated the hampering actions of GPX4 respectively, therebymodulatingcellularferroptosis[111].
The mitochondrial DHODH- CoQ10H2 pathway in addition toFSP- CoQ10- NADPH pathway work independently of each other , however both resulted in reduction of CoQ10 to CoQ10H2 for escalating the mitochondrial defense mechanistic modes against ferroptosis.
3.ERS
On getting challenged by inherent factors for instance oncogenic activation, changed chromosome numbers or escalated capability of liberation, along with extrinsic factors for instance deprivation of nutrients as well as acidosis, changed protein homeostasis result in accrual of misfolded in addition to unfolded proteins in the lumen of ER, causing activation ofERS in addition to UPR, therefore restoration of homeostasis in cells[19]. Nevertheless, in case of continuation ofERS/ robust stimuli,UPR threshold getsovertaken, cell demiseresults, which inturn results in cancer generation[112].
Starting of UPR occurs by three main ERS sensors, with their placement in the ER membrane, inclusive of inositol requiring enzyme protein 1α (IRE1α), Protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) along with activating transcription factor6(ATF6) [113]. TheER chaperone binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP) works in the form of master controller of the UPR binding as well as inactivating the three ERS sensors, IRE1α, PERK in addition to ATF6[113], negative controlling them along with guaranteeing their inactivating status. Onaccrual ofmisfolded proteins in the lumen ofER ,their binding occurs to the hampering chaperone BiP as well as separate it, activating the three ERS sensors for starting of UPR signaling[114]. Fig2 details ERS.
Legend for Figure2
Courtesy reference no-86Mechanisms of ERS. Accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the lumen of the ER activates three transmembrane proteins of the unfolded protein response (IRE1, PERK and ATF6) and thereby restores cellular homeostasis. IRE1: Activation of IRE1 kinase results in the excision of an intron in the mRNA encoding the XBP1 transcription factor, and ligase mediates the linking of two mRNA fragments to produce stably active XBP1s. Stable XBP1s activity is involved in subsequent ER biogenesis. PERK: GADD34 forms a loop by regulating eIF2α dephosphorylation, thereby modulating ATF4-mediated ER biogenesis. ATF6: ATF6 is translocated to the Golgi under conditions of ERS and is sequentially hydrolyzed by S1P and S2P proteins, thereby regulating ER biogenesis. ATF4, activating transcription factor 4; ASK, apoptosis signal-regulating kinase; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; BiP, binding immunoglobulin protein; eIF2α, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ERS, ER stress; GADD34, growth arrest DNA-damage 34; IRE1, inositol-requiring protein 1α; P, phosphorylated; PERK, protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase; RIDD, regulated IRE1-dependent decay; S1P, serine protease site 1; S2P, metalloprotease site 2; TRAF2, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2; XBP1, homeostasis transcription factor X-box protein 1.
3.1IRE 1 pathway
IRE 1 constitutedbytwo isoforms-namely IRE1α as well asIRE 1β; IRE 1β expression basically takes place in gastrointestinal Tract(GIT), along with respiratory tract, while IRE1α possesses broader expression[115]. The cytoplasmic tail IRE1α possesses twodomains,a serine /threonine kinase, structural domain in addition to aribonuclease(RNase) structural domain that function in togetherness[116]. Subsequent to binding to misfolded proteins activation ofkinase domain of IRE1α occurs, followed byits going through dimerization, coupling along with the transautophosphorylation, resulting inectopic activation of structural domain ofRNase[117]. With the catalysis of active RNaseexcision of intronwhich possesses26 nucleotides ( nt) frommessenger ribonucleic acid(mRNA) encoding homeostasis transcription factor X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1), subsequently cleavage of two mRNA fragments occurs byRNA splicing ligase RNA 2’3’ cyclicphosphate as well as5’OH ligase resulting in formation of active transcription factor XBP1 (alias spliced form or XBP1s) [118]. XBP1sisimplicated in thegenes encoding ER membrane biogeneration, ER proteins folding, ER correlated breaking down, in addition toplethora of UPR [119]. C/EBP-homologous protein(CHOP) ,a controller of ERS stimulated apoptosis,getsactivated by activatingtranscription factor4(ATF4) via PERK- ATF4- CHOP pathway[120]. Additionally, IRE1α facilitates apoptosis by activating apoptosissignal regulated kinase 1(ASK)/ c-Jun-N-terminal kinase(JNK) pathway by binding of tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor(TRAF) [121]. Furthermore, regulated IRE1-dependent decay of mRNA (RIDD), represents an innovative UPR controlled pathway, which has been isolated in controlling cell fatein the impact of ERS . Activated RNase possessthe capability of targeting mRNAs along with the miRNAs by controlling such pathway[122].
Zundell etal. [123], illustrated that pharmacologicalhampering of IRE1α/XBP1 pathway, might work in the form of an innovative approach for AT-rich interactive domaincontaining protein(Arid1a) mutant cancers as well as XBP1geneKO led to improvementof cellsurvival in case of inactivated ovarian clear cell carcinomas[bearing Arid1a [123]. Song etal.[124], illustrated that regulating ERS or targeting the IRE1α- XBP1 signaling manipulated mitochondrial actions, in addition to therefore regulating T cells metabolic adapting along with tumorigenic capability in casesofOC [124]. The mitochondrial -correlated ER membrane further might work in the form ofa significant association among st mitochondria along with the ER[125]. The continuation of activation of IRE1α- XBP1 pathway of dendriticcells in OC microenvironment was reported by Cubillos Ruiz etal.[126], in view of the sustenance of ERS that interfered with antigenpresenting (AP) capability ofmetabolic homeostasis of the dendriticcells as well as reducedtheir protective working in embracingT cells against tumors, emphasizing adistinctimmunotherapeuticstrategyfor OCtherapy. OC cells use ERS for cellsurvival via the activation of IRE1α/XBP1 pathway, amongst rest of pathways as well as coactivator associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1)that is canonically upregulated in OC cells has been displayed in the controlling of XBP1s target genes in addition to possess selective sensitivity to the hampering of IRE1α/XBP1 pathway, mightbe utilized in the form of aplausible therapeutictarget approach for treatment of cells which expressCARM1[127].
3.2 PERK pathway
PERK represents a transmembrane which has a kinness to IRE 1, that possesses ER lumenal dimerization structural domain in addition to acytoplasmic kinase structural domain. The tubulin dimerization structural domain of PERK possesses lesser akinnessto structural domain of IRE 1. The cytoplasmic kinase structural domain of PERK furthergoes via trans autophosphorylation, in reaction to ERS, however it differs fromIRE 1 init further leads to phosphorylationoftranslationalinhibitor eukaryotic initiation factor2 α(eIF-2α),at serine51 along with the phosphorylated eIF-2α hampersfull translation of proteins, as well asdecreases the quantities of proteins gaining entry into theER lumen[128]. Additionally,eIF-2αphosphorylation, changes theeffectiveness of AUG start codon[129], that leads topropensity fortranslation of ATF4 mRNA[128].
ATF4 represents a transcription factor whichactivates downstream UPR target genes, forinstance expression of growth arrest enhanced DNA damage inducible 34(GADD34), that stimulate the expression of CHOP [128,130]. CHOP facilitateDNA injury, hampers cellproliferation in addition to activates apoptosis by upregulatingproapoptotic B cell lymphoma-2(Bcl2) family members[131]. Thereby ATF4 works in the form of a significant factor in ER working gene expression, ERS modulated ROSformation , along with ERSmodulated apoptosis . ATF4 further possesses the capability of controlling dephosphorylation ofeIF-2α via GADD45for generatinga feedback loop for reverting PERKmodulated translation decay[132]. Additionally, PERK phosphorylates nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor-2(Nrf2), therefore upregulating antioxidants for facilitatingcellular antioxidation[133]. Collectively, these outcomes suggest that PERK- eIF-2α pathway modulates facilitation of cellsurvival at the time of ERS , however switches to the facilitation of apoptosis in case of continuation of ERS as well as aidsin sustenance of cellularhomeostatic equilibrium by activating ATF4 in addition toNRF2. Thereby PERK pathway represents afavourable therapeutic targetfor OC treatment.
3.3 ATF6 pathway
ATF6 represents a type IItransmembrane witha carboxy terminal- stresssensing lumenal structural domain as well as amino terminal b Zip transcription factor structural domain[134]. Transportation of ATF6 occurs to the golgi apparatus in case of situations of ERS,where its hydrolysis occurs in a sequential manner by the serineprotease site1(S1P)in addition to metalloprotease site2(S2P) proteins for the liberation ofamino terminal transcription factor structural domain which synergistically with XBP1 resulted in upregulation of genes implicated in proteins folding, along with the ER amplification in addition to genes implicated in ER correlated breakdown pathway constituents[135]. In case of OCtumor tissue it has been displayed that ATF6 expression of OC is greater in tumor tissue in contrast tonormal ovarian tissue[136], as well as irreversible ERS,it resultin downregulation of quantities of antiapoptotic proteins [137]. Additionally, by controlling ATF6, sensitivity of OC cells to chemotherapeutic drugs mightbe changed[138]. Nevertheless,part ofATF6 in case of ER cell demise continues tobeuncharted in addition tocotargeting chemotherapeutic drugs for improvementof OCcellsurvival still is uncharted .
4. Crosstalk of Ferroptosis along withERS in OC
With thesluggish escalation ofattraction in ferroptosis along withERS, escalating quantities of studies have illustrated thatferroptosis along withERS possessa significant influence on OC, with intricate association amongst the two [22,139].
Chen etal. [140], observed thatcontrolling ferroptosis in OCcellsenhanced the anti proliferative actions of cannabinoid derivative in vivo, as well asin vitro efficaciously hampering the generation of OC[141]. Organoids got utilized by Liu etal. [142], where they illustrated that hampering ofovariantumorigenesis occured subsequent toefficaciously targeting ferroptosis. Additionally, ferroptosis associated mechanistic modes hadthe capacity of reverting cisplatin resistance in OC[14], influencing chemotherapy resistance in OCalong with the prognosis of patients withOC[143]. Luo etal. [144], promoted the plausible clinical translation of targeting ferroptosis OC diagnosis in addition to synergistic therapy by combination offer roptosis mechanistic modes with the nanotechnology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as cisplatin chemotherapeutic treatment [144].
ERS possessa significant the generationin addition toprognosis of patients withOC.As per studiesactivation of UPR sensorsas well as therefore ERS stimulated possesses the capability of stimulating apoptosis of OC cells [145], in addition to controlling of ERS correlated targetsimpacting resistance to chemotherapy regarding Octherapy [146], emphasizing the plausibility of innovative targets regarding OCtherapy.
Zhang etal. [147], generated an attractive medical gadget for the prognostic evaluation of OC patients with epithelial OC by generatinga risk classification for the differentially expressed genes correlated with ERS.Ma etal. [148], made use of nanotechnology for precision along withlong lasting stimulating photodynamic reaction- therefore stimulating antitumor actions in case of a mouse model of OC .
An escalating quantities of studies have illustrated the existence of association amongst ferroptosis along withERS, thatshare akin pathways [149], as well asROS,a side derivative of ERS, might aggravate ferroptosis, whereas ERS portrays acritical region at the time of ferroptosis, further aggravate ferroptosis. Nevertheless, ferroptosis along withERS havenotbeen detailed in togetherness with regards to OC, as well as their crosstalk studies are not present.Figure3 illustrates observed mechanistic modes correlated with ferroptosis along withERS.
Legend for Figure3
Courtesy reference no-86Interactions between ferroptosis and ERS. ERS induces ferroptosis. ERS activates the IRE1α-XBP1s-Gα12, PERK-eIF2α-ATF4-CHOP, PERK-Nrf2-HO-1, PERK-P53-System Xc− and ATF6-PLA2G4A-AA-PGE2 pathways to induce ferroptosis. ERS inhibits ferroptosis. ERS inhibits ferroptosis by activating the PERK-eIF2α-ATF4-HSPA5 and PERK-eIF2α-ATF4-CHAC1 pathways. AA, arachidonic acid; ALOX12, arachidonate 12-lipoxygenase, 12S type; ATF4, activating transcription factor 4; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; CHAC1, cation transport regulator homolog 1; CHOP, C/EBP homologous protein; eIF2α, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α; ERS, endoplasmic reticulum stress; Gα12, G protein subunit α 12; GSH, glutathione; HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; Hrd1, E3 ligase; HSPA5, heat shock 70 kDa protein 5; IRE1α, inositol-requiring protein 1α; miR, microRNA; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; PERK, protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; PLA2G4A, phospholipase A2 group IVA; XBP1, homeostasis transcription factor X-box protein 1.
Zhong etal. [21],illustrated that ERS gets modulated by controlling of ferroptosis,they illustrated that ferroptosis as well asferroptosis modulated ERS resultin injury to prefrontal cortex neurons in addition to ferroptosis in prefrontal cortex neurons thatresultin activation of ERS correlated PERK- ATF4- CHOPpathway. The ferroptosis hampering agents of LOXs forinstance liproxstatin -1alongwith the iron chelator desferoxamine (DFO), diminished the expression quantities of part restoration of ferroptosis correlated protein, upregulation of Nrf2 expression, downregulation of phosphorylated PERK, ATF4 as well asCHOP, in addition todiminished ERS by hampering ferroptosis. This led to mitigation of chronic intermittent hypoxia stimulated neuronal injury along with cognitive impairment , that yielded a therapeutic target with regards to treatment of neurocognitive impairment which occurred as aresult of chronic intermittent hypoxia[21]. ERS works in the form of a significant factor with regards to causative factor for the obesity correlated myocardial abnormalities with the upregulation of ERS markers which occur in case ofcontinued obesity. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid(TUDCA) possesses the capacity of ameliorating obesity correlated ERS stimulated myocardial impairment,whileferroptosis stimulates the depletion of advantageousactions yielded by TUDCA as well as escalates the actions of ERS[150]. Yang etal. [149], observed that activationof ferroptosis signaling in tumor cells facilitated the generation as well asliberation of exosomes which possesses the misfolded in addition to unfolded proteins, hampered ERS along with cellsurvival of the tumor cells[176]. Furthermore,ithas been demonstrated that the ERS- ferroptosis signaling - exosomes pathway stimulated ERS agents resistance ,emphasizing plausibly crucial intracellular mechanistic modes, which mightbe implicated in case of ERS signaling, ERS homeostasis as well as resistance to chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. Dihydroartemisinin(DHA) possesses the capability of stimulating ferroptosis of immunogenic cells in lung cancer, by accrual of LPO in addition to concomitantly stimulate cellular ERS. Greater evaluation illustrated that ferroptosis hampering agents resultedin depletion of DHA stimulated ERS, emphasizing a plausibly innovative therapeutic approach for the cancer therapywith theuse of canonical Chinese medicine in case of cancer immunotherapy[151].
Akin tothat,the controlling of ERS further is capable of influencing ferroptosis. Han etal. [152], demonstrated that the polydatin mitigated early braininjury subsequent tosubarachnoid haemorrhage via upregulation of sirtuin (SIRT1) expression, along with therefore hampering ferroptosis in neuronal cells[152]. Wang etal. [153], displayedthat ERS hampering agent 4phenylbutyric acid hampered ferroptosis inepithelial cells in theairway for the avoidance of acute lung injury, by ERS downregulation, reverting the lipopolysaccharide(LPS)stimulated reduction in GSH as well astherefore hampering the of ferroptosis proteins, ACSL4,COX2 in addition to ferritinheavy polypeptide(FTH1), therefore emphasizing plausible modalitiesfor the acute lung injury.Iin vitroworkon ovarian granulosa cells displayed escalated ROSformation, lipid peroxidation along with intracellular iron quantities in cells getting testosterone(T) therapy. Theexpression quantities of SLC7A11, a crucial protein of System Xc.– were further changed,leadingto diminished intracellular GSH generation as well as cystine insufficiency, which resultedin reduction of intracellular GPX4 quantities, the basic intracellular antioxidant, therefore stimulating ferroptosis in granulosa cells. Nevertheless, the T stimulated ferroptosis event gotdiminished by the ERS hampering agents [154]. Jiang etal. [155], observed that IRE1α, a controlling protein which works in the form of a significant factor with regards to UPR, estimate the proneness to ferroptosis by controlling the generation of GSH , pointing that hampering of IRE1αis an attractive approach for mitigating ferroptosis correlated pathological disease.Additionally,it wasillustrated that exogenous melatonin,the way elaborated by usearlier innon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) treatment[24], works by hampering ERS through the MT2/cAMP/PKA/IRE1 signaling pathway[156].The heavy metal cadmium works in the form of an escalated risk factor regardinghepatocyte ferroptosis as well as liver damage in addition to ferroptosis development is usually associated with activation of PERK- eIF-2α- ATF4- CHOP pathway,whose countering mightbe attained by hampering of the ERS fordiminishing ferroptosis-thus cadmium stimulated ferroptosis is basedon ERS[157]. Cadmium further controls ferroptosis along with stimulates nephrotoxicity in renal tubular epithelialcells via the above-mentioned mechanistic modes causing kidney injury [158]. Results obtained from Ulcerative colitis (UC) studypointed that ERS implicatedin the generation of ferroptosis. eIF-2α portrays a constituent of PERK branch of the ERS reactions, along with thephosphorylated nuclear factor κB(NFκB)p65 hampers ERS, therefore conferred protection to the intestinal epithelial cells in UC by directly crosstalking with eIF-2α[159].
Colorectal cancer (CRC)portrays a frequent malignancy of the digestive system, where primary surgery, along with chemotherapy had restricted efficaciousness[160].Tagitinin C, portrays a naturalproduct, stimulates ERS generation, resultingin nuclear translocation of Nrf2 in addition toupregulation of hemeoxygenase-1(HO1). HO1 portrays a downstream effector of Nrf2, which resultsin escalatedpool of unstable iron, therefore facilitating lipid peroxidation.A synergistic antitumor action of escalated pool of unstable iron with erastin resultedinstimulating ferroptosis in CRC cells . Therefore tagitinin C has been isolated in the form of an innovative stimulator of ferroptosis along with robust sensitizer[161]. Additionally, in case ofprostate cancer study, the modulation of arachidonic acid (AA ) liberation as well asbiogeneration of prostaglandins,ATF6 , PhospholipaseA2 GroupIVA was observed to confer protection to the prostate cancer cells from ferroptosis[162]. Upregulation of Gα12via IRE 1-XBP1 pathway subsequent toERS in hepatocytes , thus facilitatedthehepatic ferroptosis as well asaggravates acute liver injurythrough Rho associated coiledcoil containing protein 1 (ROCK), modulated 12lipooxygenase( ALOX12) in addition tomiR‑15a [163]. Additionally, in case of a studycorrelated with diabetic nephropathy, ERS resultedin downregulation of SLC7A11 expression via the XBP1- E3 ubiquitinligase- Nrf2pathway, which diminishedGSH antioxidant quantities in addition to escalated cellular sensitivity to ferroptosis, therefore stimulating ferroptosis, which yielded understandinginto the plausible mechanistic modes which postponed epithelial –mesenchymal transition (EMT) in renal tubular cells[22].
Additionally, variable studies have illustrated herbal constituents are capable of causingimprovementof ferroptosis by modulating ERS. Esculin,a substance which is an extract from cortex of willow bark, hampers the generation along with thepropagation ofcolon cancer, by activation of ERS -PERK signaling pathway as well asstimulating apoptosis in addition toferroptosis via the Nrf2/HO‑1 along with the eIF2α/CHOPpathways[164]. Tanshinone IIA, the basic active constituent of the canonical Chinese medicine,Danshen, has been illustrated to execute antitumoractions basically in theER modulated ferroptosis signaling pathway, causing downregulationof ferroptosis in tumor cellsvia PERK - ATF4- heat shock 70kDaprotein5( HSPA5) pathway[165]. Escalated acetaminophen dosage, is the main etiological factor of drug stimulated acute liver injury .Salidroside hampers ERS modulated ferroptosisthrough the ATF4- cation regulator homolog-1axis by activatingthe 5’ AMP-activated protein kinase(AMPK) /SIRT1 signaling pathway as well as possessesa significant partin attenuating acetaminophen stimulated acute liver injury[166]. In case of astudy on glioma,DHA stimulated ERS resultedinupregulationof ATF4through PERK by escalatingthe expression in addition to actions of GPX4,thushampering DHA stimulated lipid peroxidation along with conferred protection to glioma cells throughuse of via PERK/ATF4/HSPA5 pathway , emphasizing an innovative mechanistic modes for glioma therapy [167].
Additionally,ERS stimulates Ca2+ liberation as well as transportation of TF gets controlled by cytoplasmic Ca2+ quantities therefore influencing intracellular iron quantities as well as ferroptosis in colon cancer cells[168]. Ferroptosis treatment which concentrates on intracellular escalated ROS generation in addition to LPO accrual,has proven to be an innovative approach for lung cancer therapy .Administrationofaferroptosisnano-stimulator, constitutedof DHAin addition to pH reactive calcium phosphateis doneto lungs using a nebulizer. The cyclic Ca2+‑burst possesses the capability of modulating ERS , thereforefacilitating ROS accrual, resultinginaggravation of ferroptosis, yielding aninnovative research trajectoryfor lung cancer therapy[169].
It has<
*Corresponding Author: Kulvinder Kochar Kaur
Citation: Hiroshi Sonobe, Rika Omote. Soft Tissue Myoepitheliomas: A Discussion of Pathological Characteristics and Fusion Genes, J Clinical and Medical Research and Studies, V (4)I(5), DOI: 10.59468/2836-8525/126
Copyright: © 2025 Kulvinder Kochar Kaur. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: August 17, 2025 | Accepted: August 25, 2025 | Published: August 28, 2025
Abstract
Ferroptosis portrays a distinct kind of cell demise, guided by iron based phospholipid peroxidation, as well as mechanistic modes basically implicated in iron metabolism, dysequilibrium of the antioxidant system in addition to accrual of lipid peroxides.Protein processing alongwith folding in the endoplasmic reticulum(ER) are intricately associated with controlling events which estimate cellworking ,fate as well as their survival .The nonregulatedproliferation capacity of malignant cellsforms an unattractive microenvironment which have properties ofgreater metabolic needs, nutrient deprivationas well as metabolic acidosis , facilitates the accrual of misfolded in addition to unfolded proteins in thelumen ofER causing activation of the unfolded protein responses(UPR) that resultsin endoplasmic reticulum stress(ERS). Ferroptosis& ERS share pathways in variable diseases in addition to the two crosstalk for influencing cell fate, survival and demise. Moreover, cell demise pathways are not simply linear signaling stepwise patterns as well as variable cell demise pathways might be correlated at plethora of levels. Ferroptosis& ERS in ovarian cancer (OC)have evoked considerable attention of scientific researchers, nevertheless, the two have not been detailed in togetherness with regards to OC, as well as their crosstalk studies are not present. In this narrative review we describe the plausible association amongst Ferroptosis& ERS to yield grounds for generating therapeutic strategies for managing OC. |
Keywords: Ferroptosis; endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS); ovarian cancer (OC); unfolded protein responses (UPR)
References
- 1. JiangC, ShenC,NiM, HuangL,HuH,DaiQ,et al. Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance in Ovarian Cancer. GenesDis2023;11:101063. 2. Maioru OV,Radoi VE,Coman MC,Hoticeanu JA,DanA,Eftenoiu AE,et al. Developments in genetics:better management of Ovarian Cancer patients.Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:15987. 3. MallenA,Todd S,R SE, KimJ, Sehovic M,Wenham R,et al. Impact of age, co-morbidity and treatment characteristic. Gynaecol Oncol2021;161:693-9. 4. Lumish MA,Kohn EC,Tew WP.Top advances of the year: Ovarian cancer. Cancer 202417;130(21): 837-45. 5. ZhangC, LiuX,JinS, ChenY, GuoR. Ferroptosis in cancertherapy: Novel approach to reversing drugresistance.Mol Cancer2022; 21:47. 6. TengK,MaH,GaiP, ZhaoX,QiP.SPHK1 enhances Olaparibresistance in ovarian cancer through NFκB/ NRF/ ferroptosis pathway.Cell Death Discov 2025;11:29. 7. KapperC,OppeltP,P,A B,G AA,V I,SP,R F M.Targeting ferroptosis in ovarian cancer: Novel strategies to overcome chemotherapy resistance.Life Sci2024;349:122720. 8. TangD, ,KangR, ,KroemerG. Ferroptosis in Hepatocellular carcinoma: from Bench to Bedside. Hepatology2024;80: 721-39. 9. Hushmani K,Klionsky DJ,Aref SR,Bonyadi M,Reiter RJ,Nabavy N,et al. Ferroptosis contributes to the progression of female specificneoplasms, from breast cancer to gynaecolgical malignancies in a mannerregulated by non coding RNAs: mechanistic implications. Noncoding RNA Res 2024; 9:1159-77. 10. WuY,JiaC, Liu W, ZhanW, ChenY,LuJ,et al. Sodium citrate targeting Ca2+ /CAMKK2pathwayexhibits,anti tumor activity through inducing apoptosis and ferroptosis in ovarian cancer.J Adv Res2024;65:89-104. 11. LiJ, ChenM, HuangD, LiZ, ChenY, HuangJ,et al.Inhibition of selenoprotein1 promotes ferroptosis and reverses resistance to platinum chemotherapy impairing Akt phosphorylation in ovarian cancer. Med Commun2020; 5:e70033. 12. ZhangB, GuoB,KongH,YangL,YanH, LiuJ,et al.Decoding the ferroptosis related gene signatures and immune infiltration patterns in ovarian cancer: Bioinformatics prediction integrated with experimental validation . JInflamm Res 2024;17:10333-46. 13. LiG, ShiS,TanJ,HeL, LiuQ,FangF,et al. High efficient synergistic chemotherapy and magnetic resonance imaging for targeted ovarian cancertherapy hyaluronic acid- coated coordination polymer nanoparticles. Adv Sci(Weinh) 2024;11:2309464. 14. Hetz C,Chevet E,Oakess SA.Pproteostasis control by the unfolded protein response. Nat Cell Biol2015; 17: 829-8. 15. Sim s SG, isney RN,Lipscomb MM,Meares GP. The role of endoplasmic reticulum stressin astrocytes.Glia2022;70:5-19. 16. Hu H,TianM,Ding C,YuS. The C/EBP-homologous protein(CHOP) transcription factor functions in endoplasmic reticulum stress inducedapoptosis and infections. Front Immunol2019;9: 3083. 17. RenJ,BiY,S JR, Hetz C, ZhangY. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in cardiovasculardisease. Nat RevCardiol2021;18:499-51. 18. SongM,Cubillos Ruiz JR. Endoplasmic reticulum stress response in intra tumoral immune cells: implicationsfor cancer immunotherapy . Trends Immunol2019; 40:128- 41. 19. YanT,MaX, Zhou L, GuoL,LuR. Targeting endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling in ovarian cancer therapy. Cancer Biol Med2023;20:748-64. 20. WangL, MaX, Zhou L, LuoM, LuY, WangY,et al. Dual targeting TrxR- EGFR Alkynyl-Au(I)gefitinib complexinduces ferroptosis in gefitinibresistant lung cancer via degradation of GPX4. J Med Chem2025;68: 5275-91. 21. ZhongP,LiL, FengX,TengC, CaiW, ZhengW,etal. Neuronal ferroptosis and ferroptosis mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress: implications in cognitive dysfunctions induced by chronic intermittent hypoxia in mice. Int Immunopharmacoll 2024;138:112579 22. Liu Z, Nan P, Gong Y, Tian L, Zheng Y, Wu Z: Endoplasmicreticulum stress‑triggered ferroptosis via the XBP1‑Hrd1‑Nrf2 pathway induces EMT progression in diabetic nephropathy.Biomed Pharmacother2023;164: 114897 23. Kulvinder Kochar Kaur,Allahbadia GN,Singh M. ‘’Combined use of Cell Death Mechanisms as plausible therapeutictargets with canonical therapies for Breast Cancer: potentiallydecreasingdose,toxicity,expenditure&improvedsurvival -A narrative review’’- Accepted for Publication in Women Health Care & Gynaecology 2025 24. Kulvinder Kochar Kaur,Allahbadia GN,Singh M. Melatonin as a Future prospective therapyfor Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease bytargeting hepatic ferroptosis: -- A Short Communication’’. Acta Scientific Gastrointestinal Disorders 2025; 8 (5): 35-45 25. Kulvinder Kochar Kaur,Allahbadia GN. An update onTargeting Ferroptosis for generatinginnovative strategies in treatmentof Diabetic Kidney Disease: a narrative review’’-under review 26. YeR, MaoYM,FeiYR,ShangY, ZhangT, ZhangZZ,et al. Targeting ferroptosis for the treatment of female reproductive system disorders. J Mol Med 2025;103:381-402 27. DixonSJ,LembergKM,LamprechtMR,ScoutaR,ZaitsevEM,GleasonCE,etal. Ferroptosis,aniron dependent non apoptotic form of cell death.Cell 2012;149:1060-72 28. Muckenthaler MU ,Rivella S, HentzeMW, Galy B.A red carpet for iron metabolism .Cell 2017;168:344-361 29. Galy B,Conrad M Muckenthaler MU. Mechanisms controlling cellular and systemic iron homeostasis. Nat RevMolCell Biol2020;12:263-76 30. AndersonGJ,Frazer DM.C current understanding of iron homeostasis. Am J ClinNutr2017;106 (Suppl6):1559S-1566S 31. Gulec S, AndersonGJ,C JF.Mechanisticand regulatory aspects of intestinal iron absorption. Am J Physiol Gastroenterol LiverPhysiol 2014;308:G397-G409 32. MontalbettiN,SimoninA,Kovavs G,Hediger MA.Mammalian iron transporter: families SLC11 and SLC40.MolAspects Med 2013;348:270-87 33. LiH, WangD,WuH,ShenH,LvD, ZhangY,et al. SLC46A1 contributes tohepatic iron metabolism by importingheme in hepatocytes. Metabolism 2020; 110: 154306 34. Mayneris Perxachs J, MorenoNavarretteJM, Fernandez RealJM. The role of iron in host microbiota and itseffecton systemic glucose metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2022;18:683-98 35. Seyoum Y, Baye K,HumblotC. Iron homeostasis in host - gut bacteria-a` complex interrelationship. Gut Microbes2021;13:1- 19 36. ZhaoH,TangC, Wang M, ZhaoH, ZhuY. Ferroptosis as an emerging target in Rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol2023;14:1260839 37. YangWS, KimKJ, Patel M,ShchepinovMS, Stockwell BR. Peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids by lipooxygenases drivesferroptosis. Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 2016;113:E4966-E4975 38. Kajarabille N, LatundeDada GO. Programmed cell death by ferroptosis: antioxidants as .Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:4968 39. ZhangL,R J, Liu X, WangX, WangC,FuS, XiaoJ. Attenuation es of sepsis acute kidney injury by external H2S via inhibition of ferroptosis Molecules2023;28:4770 40. DengM, TangF,ChangX, ZhangY, LiuP,JiX,etal. A targetableOSGINI-AMPK-SLC2A3 axiscontrols the vulnerability of ovarian cancer to ferroptosis. NPJ Precis Oncol2025; 9: 15 41. 42. TortiSV, TortiFM. Iron and cancer:more ore to be mined. Nat Rev Cancer2013; 13: 342-45 43. ToyukuniS. Theorigin and future of oxidative stress pathology: from the recognizationof carcinogenesis as addiction with ferroptosis resistance to nonthermal plasma therapy. Pathol Int2016;66: 245-59 44. Basauli D,Tesfay L,DengZ,Paul B, YamamotoY,NingG,etal. Iron addiction: a novel therapeutictarget in ovarian cancer. Oncogene 2017;36:4089-99. ies 45. ChenY,LiaoX,JingP,HuL,YangZ,YaoY,etal. Linolenic acid -glucosaminehybrid for endogenous iron activated ferroptosis therapy in ahigh grade serous ovarian cancers. Mol Pharmacol2022; 19:3187-98 46. PiskounovaE,A M, Murphy MM, HuZ,HuddlestunSE,etal.oxidative stressinhibits distant metastasis by human melanoma cells.Nature 2015;5275: 186- 91 47. BauckmanK,Hll E,Taran N, RockfieldS, Ruiz RiveraA, NanjundanM. Ironalterscell survival in a mitochondrial dependent pathway in ovarian cancer cells. Biochem J 2015;466: 401-13 48. XuX, WangY, GuoW, ZhouY, LvC, ChenX, Liu K.The significance of the alterations of 8OHdG in serous ovarian carcinoma. J OvarianRes2035;6:74 49. PratJ,D’Angelo E,Espinosa I. Ovarian carcinomas:At least 5 different diseases with distinct histologicalfeatures andmolecular genetics. Hum Pathol 2018;80:11-27 50. DengZ,ManzDH,TortiSV,TortiFM. Effectsof ferroportin mediated iron depletion in cells representativeof different histological subtypes of prostate cancer.AntiOxidRedox Signal2019;30: 1043-61 51. HannHW,Stalhut MW,Blumberg BS. Iron nutrition and tumor growth: decreased tumor growth in iron deficient mice. Cancer Res1988;48:4168-70 52. White S,TaetleR,Seligman PA RutherfordM, TownbridgeIS. Combination of transferrin receptor monoclonal antibodies inhibit human tumor cellgrowth in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res1990;50:6295-301 53. Sandoval -Acuna C, TorrealbaN, TomkovaV, JadhavSB, BlazkovaK,MertaL,etal. Targeting mitochondrial iron metabolism tumor growth and metastasis byinducing mitochondrial dysfunction and mitophagy. Cancer Res2021;81:2289-2303 54. Benyamin B,Esko T,Ried JS,RadhakrishnanA,VVermeulen SH,Traglia M,etal. Novel loci affecting iron homeostasis and their effects inindividuals at risk forhemochromatosis. Nat Commun2014;5: 4926 55. WangX,DuZW, XuTM, WangXJ,LiW,GaoJL,etal.HIF 1αis a rational targetfor futureovarian cancertherapies. FrontOncol2021;11:785111 56. WuJ,BaoL, ZhangZ,YiX. Nrf2induces cisplatin resistance viasuppressing the iron export rrelated gene SLC40A1 in ovarian cancer cells.Oncotarget 2017;8:93502-15 57. SzymonikJ,WalaK,GornickiT, Saczko J, PencakowskiB,KulbaachaJ. The impact of ironchelatorson the biologyof cancerstem cells.Int J Mol Sci 2021;23:89 58. WangL, LiX,MuY,LuC, TangSLuK,etal.The ironchelator desferoxamine synergizes with chemotherapy for cancer treatment. J Trace elements Med Biol 2019;56:131-8 59. Greeneshields AL, ShepherdTG, Hoskin DW. Contribution of reactive oxygen species to ovarian cancer cells growth arrestand killing by the antimalarialdrug artesunate. Mol Carcinogenesis2017; 56:75- 93 60. YangND, TanSH,NgS, ShiY, ZhouJ, TanKS,etal. Artesunateinduces cell death in human cancer cells via lysosomalfunction and lysosomal degradation of ferritin. J Biol Chem2014;289:33425-441 61. Cheng Y,QuW,LiJ,JiaB, SongY, WangL,etal. ferristatin II an iron uptake inhibitor,exertsneuroprotection againsttraumaticbrain injury via suppressing ferroptosis. ACS Chem Neurosci2022;13: 664-75 62. ZhangY, HeF,HuW,SunJ, ZhaoH, Cheng Y,etal. Bortezomib intracellular free Fe 2+, enhancing NCOA4 ferritinophagy and synergizes withRSL3 toinhibit , multiple myeloma cells. Ann Haematol2024; 103:3627-37 63. MaS, HensonES, ChenY,GibsonSB. Ferroptosis is induced following siramesine and lapatinibtreatment of breast cancer cells. Cell DeathDis 2016;7:e2307 64. Stockwell BR, Friedman Angeli JP, Bayir H,BushAI,Conrad M, DixonSJ,etal.Ferroptosis: Regulated cell death nexuslinking metabolism, redox biology and disease.Cell 2017;171:273-85 65. MortensonMS, RuizJ,W JL.Polyunsaturated fatty acidsdrivelipid peroxidation during ferroptosis. Cells 2023;12:804 66. Liu S, YangX,ZhengS, ChenC,QiL,XuX,ZhangD. Researchprogress in the use of traditional Chinese medicine to diseases by regulating Ferroptosis. Genes Dis2024; 12:804 67. RodencalJ, DixonSJ.A tale of two lipids: lipid unsaturation commands ferroptosis sensitivity . Proteomics 2023;237:e21000308 68. KaganVE,MaoG,QuF,Angeli JP,Doll S, CroixC CS,etal. Oxidized arachidonic and adrenic PE’snavigatecells to ferroptosis. Nat Chem Biol2017;13:81-90 69. ForcinaGC, DixonSJ. GPX4 at thecrossroads lipid homeostasis and ferroptosis. Proteomics 2019; 1923:e1800311 70. YinH, XuL, PorterNA. Free Radical lipid peroxidation: mechanisms and analysis. Chem Rev2011;111:5944-72 71. JiangX,,Stockwell BR, Conrad M. Ferroptosis: mechanisms, biology and role in disease. Nat RevMolCell Biol2021;22:266-82 72. Murphy MP.Howmitochondria producereactive oxygen species. Biochem J 2009;417: 1-13 73. Zheng J,Conrad M. Themetabolic underpinnings of ferroptosis. Cell Metab 2020;32:920-37 74. ChenJ, DuanZ,DengL,LiL,LiQ,QuJ,etal. Cell membrane targeting typeI/II photodynamic therapy combination withFSP1 inhibition ferroptosisenhanced photodynamicimmunotherapy.Adv Healthc Mater2024;13: e2304436 75. WangQ,JiH,HaoY, JiaD,MaH, SongC,etal.Illumination ofhydroxyl radical generated in cells during ferroptosis,Arabidopsis thaliana and miceusing a new turn on near infra redImmunofluorescene probe. Anal Chem 2024;96: 20189-96 76. SunM, ChenQ,RenY, ZhouY, XuS,RaoH,etal.CoNiCoNC tumor therapy by twowaysproducing H2O2 to aggravate energy metabolism, chemokinetics and ferroptosis. J Colloid Interface Sci2025; 678: 925-37 77. LiangKA,ChihHY, LiuIJ,YehNT,HsuTC, ChinHY,etal.Tumor targeted delivery of hyaluronic acid/poly dopamine - coated Fe 2+- doped nanoscaledmetal organic framework with Doxorubicin payload for glutathione depletion amplified- Chemodynamic- chemo cancer therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci2025; 677: 400-15 78. Stockwell BR. Ferroptosis, turns 10: emergingmolecularmechanisms, physiological functions and therapeutic applications.Cell 2022;185:2401-22 79. StoyanovskiDD,Tyurina YY, SrivastavaII,BaharI,Tyurin VA,V YA,etal.Iron catalysis of lipid peroxidation in ferroptosis: regulated enzymatic or random free radical reactions Free Radical Biol Med 2019; 133: 153-61 80. KuangF, LiuJ,XieY,TangD,KangR.MGST1is a redox sensitivereppressor of ferroptosis in pancreaticcancer cells. Cell Chem Biol2021;28:765-75 .e5 81. ChuB,Kon N, ChenD,LiT, LiuT,JiangL,etal.ALOX12 is required for p53mediated tumor suppressionthrough adistinct ferroptosis pathway. Nat Cell Biol2019;21:579-91 82. OuY, WangSJ ChuB,GuW. Activation of SAT1 engages polyamine metabolism with p53 mediated ferroptotic response s. Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 2016;113:E6806-E12 83. ZhangS, LiuQ,ChangM,PanY,YBH, LiuY,etal. Chemotherapy impairs ovarian functionthroughexcessiveROS induced ferroptosis. Cell DeathDis 2023;14:340 84. XuR, WangW, ZhangW.Ferroptosis and bidirectionalregulator factor p53.Cell Death Discov 2023;9:197 85. KuangF, LiuJ, TangD,KangR. Oxidative damage and antioxidant defense. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020;8:586578 86. LiuY,LuS,WuLL, YangL,YangL,WangJ. The role of mitochondria in ferroptosis in cancer. Cell DeathDis 2023;14:519 87. YangJ, Wang Y, LiuFY, ZhangY, HanFJ. Crosstalk between Ferroptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress:a potentialtargetforovarian cancer therapy.Int J Mol Med 2025; 55:97 88. LewerenczJ,HewettSJ, HuangY,Lambros M,Gout PW,Kalivas PW,etal. The cysteine- glutamate antiporter System Xc (-) in health and disease: molecular mechanisms novel therapeuticopportuni. AntiOxidRedox Signal2013; 19: 522-55 89. HuS,ChuY, Zhou X,WangX. Recent advances in ferroptosis: from biologicalfunction to clinical applications . Biomed Pharmacother2023;166:115419 90. YangWS, SriramaratnamR., WelschM., ShimadaK, SkoutaR, Viswanathan VS,etal. Regulation of Ferroptotic Cancer Cell Death by GPX4. Cell 2014;156:317-331 91. LiD, ZhangM, ChaoH. Significance of glutathioneperoxidase and intracellular iron levels in ovarian cancer cells- utilization of ferroptosismechanisms. Inflamm Res 2021;70:1177-89 92. SunX,NiuX, ChenR,HeW,ChenD, KangR, TangD. Metallothionen-1G facilitates Sorafenib resistance through inhibition of ferroptosis. Hepatology2016;64: 488-500 93. GuanJ,LoM,Deckery P,Mahon S,Karp CM,BuckleyAR.etal. The Xc (-)cystine/ glutamate antiporter as a potential therapeutictarget forsmallcell lung cancer:Use of Sulfasalanazine . Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2009;64:463-72 94. JiangL, Kon N,LiT, WangSJ,SuT, Hibshoosh H.etal. Ferroptosis as a p53 mediated activity during tumor suppression.Nature 2015;520:57-62 95. YuanJ, WangJ, SongM,ZhaoY, ShiY, ZhaoL.Braintargeting biomimetics disguised manganesedioxide nanoparticlesvia hybridization of tumor cell membrane and Vesicles synergistic chemotherapy/ Chemodynamic-therapy of glioma. J Colloid Interface Sci2024; 676: 378-95 96. LuoY, LiuX, ChenY, TangQ,HeC, DingX.etal. Targeting PAX8 sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to ferroptosis by inhibiting glutathione synthesis. Apoptosis2024;29: 1499-1514 97. LiFJ,LongHZ, ZhouZW LuoHY,XuSG,Gao LC. System Xc (-) / GSH / GPX4: animportant antioxidant system for theferroptosis indrugresistant solid tumortherapy. Front Pharmacol 2022;13: 910292 98. OkunoS, Sato H,KMatsumuraK,T M, WangH.etal. Role of cystine transport in intracellular glutathione levels and cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cell lines. Br J Cancer2003;88: 951-66 99. WangW,KczekT,D L,LinH, TanL, ZhaoL.etal. Effector T cells abrogate stroma mediated chemoresistance in ovarian cancer.Cell 2016;165: 1092-1105 100. BersukerK, HendricksJM, LiZ,Magtanong L,Ford B, TangPH.etal. The CoQoxidoreductase FSP acts-paralleltoGPX4 to inhibitferroptosis.Nature 2019;575:688- 92 101. Doll S,FreitasFP,Shah R,Aldrovandi M, da SilvaMC,Ingold I,etal.FSP1is a glutathione independent ferroptosis suppressor.Nature 2019;575: 693-98 102. Tesfay L,Paul BT,Konstorum A,DengZ,CoxAO, LeeJ.etal.StearoylCoA desaturase 1 gene (SCD5) ovarian cancer cells ferroptotic cell death. Cancer Res2019; 79:5355-66 103. ShimadaK, ScoutaR,KaplanA YangWS,HayanoM, DixonSJ,etal. Globalsurveycell deathmechanisms metabolic regulation of ferroptosis cell death. Nat Chem Biol2016;12:497-503 104. YangN,PanX, ZhouX, LiuZ,YangJ, ZhangJ.etal.. Biomimetic nanoarchitectonics with chitosan nanogels for collaborative induction of ferroptosis and anti cancer immunityfor cancer therapy.Adv Healthc Mater2024;13: e2302752 105. LiuMR, Shi C, SongQY, KangMJ, JiangX, LiuH.etal.. Sorafenib ferroptosis by promotingTRIM 54 mediated FSP1 and degradation in Hepatocellular carcinoma .HepatolCommun 2023;7:e0246 106. Kraft VAN,Bezjian CT,PfiefferS,Ringelsletter L,Muller L C,Zandkarimi F,etal. GTPcyclohydrolase1/ Tetrahydrobiopterin counteract ferroptosis through lipid remodeling.ACSCent Sci 2020; 6: 41-53 107. WangM, LiuJ,YuW,ShaoJ,BaoY,JinM,etal. Gambogenicsuppressesmalignant progression of non small lung cancer via GCH1 mediated ferroptosis. Pharmaceuticals( Basel)2025;18:374 108. WernerER,BlauN, ThonyB. Tetrahydrobiopterin: Biochemistry and pathophysiology. Biochem J 2011;438: 397- 414 109. NaveenKumarSK,HemShekharM, KemparajuK, GirishKN.Hemin induced platelet activation and ferroptosis is mediated through ROS driven proteasomal activity and inflammasome activation: protection by melatonin. Biochem J Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis2019;1865:2303-16 110. HommaT,Kobayashi S,Conrad M, Konno H, Yokoyama C, FujiiJ. Nitric oxideprotects against ferroptosis by aborting the lipid peroxidation Chain reactions. Nitric oxide 2021; 115: 34-43 111. MaoC, LiuX,ZhangY,LeiJ,YanY, LeeH.etal. DHODH mediated ferroptosis is a targetable vulnerability in cancer.Nature 2021; 593:586-90 112. VasanK, WernerER, ChandelNS.M mitochondrial metabolism as atarget for cancertherapy. Cell Metab 2020;32:341-52 113. WangY, WangK,JinY,ShengX.E endoplasmic reticulum proteostasis controland gastric cancer. Cancer Lett2019; 449:263-71 114. Hetz C. The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate ERstresssensorand Beyond . Nat RevMolCell Biol2012;13:89-102 115. KoppMC,Larburu N,DurairajV,Adams CJ, Ali MMU.UPR proteins IRE1 and PERK switch BiP from chaperone to ERstress. NatStruct MolBiol2019;26: 1053-62 116. TabasI,RonD. Integrating the mechanisms of apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nat Cell Biol2011; 13: 184-90 117. LuY,LiangFX, WangS.Asyntheticbiologyidentifies the mammalian UPR RNA ligase RtcB.Mol Cell 2014;55: 758-70 118. BelyyV,Zuazo-Gaztelu I,Alamban A,AshkenaziA,Walter P. Endoplasmic reticulum stressthroughreverse assemblyof inactive dimers into smalloligomers.eLife 2022;11:e743422 119. MahdiizadehSJ,Stier M,Carrlesso A,Lamy A,ThomasM, ErikssonLA. Multiscale in silicostudy of the mechanism ofthe RtcB ligase by the PTP1B phosphatase. J Chem Inf Model2024; 64: 905-17 120. Walter P, RonD. the unfolded protein response: from stresspathway to homeostaticregulation.Science 2011;334;1081-6 121. ChoyKW, MuruganDD, Mustafa MR. Natural products targeting ERstress for the treatment of cardiovasculardiseases. Pharmacol Res 2018;132:119 -29 122. Yang J,YaoS.JNK- Bcl2/ Bcl-Xl- Bax/ Bak mediatethe crosstalk between matrineminduced autophagy and via interplay with beclin1.Int J Mol Sci 2015;16: 25744-58 123. MaureM,lChevet E,TavernierJ,GerloS. GettingRIDD of RNA: IRE in cell fate regulation.Trends Biochem Sci2014; 39: 245-54 124. Zundell JA,Fukumoto T, LinJ,Fatkhudinov N, Nicarelli T,Kossenkov AV.etal. Targeting the IRE1α/XBP1 endoplasmic reticulum stress response pathway in ARID1A mutant ovarian cancers. Cancer Res2021; 81:5325-335 125. SongM,SandovalTA, ChaeCS, ChopraS, TanC,RutkowskiMR.etal.IRE1α- XBP1 control T cellsfunction ovarian cancer by regulating mitochondrial activity.Nature 2018;562: 423-98 126. Dong YF, ZhangJ, ZhouJH, XiaoYL,PieWJ,LiuHP. Mitochondrial associated endoplasmic reticulum stress membrane interference. Oncol Rep 2024;52: 112 127. Cubillos Ruiz JR, Bettigole SE,GlimcherLH. Molecular pathways: immunosuppressive rolesof IRE1α- XBP1 signaling in dendriticcells of tumor microenvironment .Clin Cancer Res2016;22: 2121-26 128. LinJ, Liu H,Fukumoto T, Zundell JA, YanQ, TangCA.etal. Targeting the IRE1α/XBP1 pathway suppresses CARM expression ovarian cancer. Nat Commun2021; 12: 5321 129. HardingHP,NovoaI, ZhangY,ZengH,WekR,SSchapira M, RonD. Regulated translation initiation controls stress induced expression in mammalian cells.Mol Cell 2000;6: 1099-1108 130. JacksonRJ,Hellen CUT,Pestova TV.The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation. Nat RevMolCell Biol2010;11: 113-27 131. ScheunerDSongB,McEwenE, LiuC,Laybutt R,G P.etal. Translational control is required for the unfolded protein responses and in vivoglucose homeostasis.Mol Cell 2001;7: 1165-76 132. GiampietriC, PetrunagroS, Conti S, FagcchianoA,Filipinni A,ZiparoE. Cancer microenvironment and unfolded protein responses. Mediat Inflamm 2015;20185:941372891 133. Hardinge HP,Zeng H,Zhang Y, NovoaI, LuPD,C M.etal.An integratedstress response regulates amino acids metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress.Mol Cell 2003;11: 619--33 134. CullinanSB,, ZhangD,H M, ArvisaisE, KaufmanRJ, DiehlJA. Nrf2is adirect PERK substrate and effector of PERK dependent cellsurvival. Mol Cell Biol2003; 23: 7198-209 135. DanW,FanY, WangY,HouT,Wie Y,LiuB,etal. The tumor suppressorTDP 52-governed endoplasmic reticulum stress is modulated by APC Cdc20. Adv Sci(Weinh) 2024;11:2405441 136. WisemanRL, MesgarzadehJS,HendershotLM.Reshaping endoplasmic reticulum quality control throughthe unfolded protein response.Mol Cell 2022; 82: 1477-91 137. ParkSJ,YoonBH,KimSK, KimSY.GENT2:An update geneexpression data base for normal tumor tissues. BMC Med Genomics 2019;12(Suppl5):S101 138. Cai Y,ArikkathJ, YangL, GuoML,PeriyasamyP,BuchS. Interplay of endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy neurodegenerative disorders.Autophagy2016;12: 225-44 139. MengJ, LiuK, ShaoY,FengX,JiZ,ChangB,etal. IDI confers cancer cells chemoresistancethroughSTAT3/ ATF6. Cell DeathDis 2020;11:137 140. QiuL, LiuK, ChenS,WuY,YanJ. Ferroptosis contributed endoplasmic reticulum stress in preterm birth by targeting LHX1 and IRE1.Cell Signal2025; 132:111777 141. ChenY,LiH, LiuJ,NiJ,DengQ,HeH,etal. Cytotoxicity of Natural and syntheticcannabinoids and their synergistic anti proliferative effects with. cisplatin in human ovarian cancer cells. Front Pharmacol 2024;15: 1496311 142. WangZ, LiuM,LiGX, ZhangL,DingKY,LiSQ,etal. Aherbal pair of Scutellaria barbataD.Don andScleromitron diffusum(Wild) RJWang induced ferroptosisin ovarian cancerA 2780 cells via hemecatabolism and inducing ferritinophagy .J Integr Med 2024;22: 665-82 143. Liu Y, Li J, Xu J, Long Y, Wang Y, Liu X, et al. m6A‑driven NAT10 translation facilitates fatty acidmetabolic rewiring to suppress ferroptosis and promote ovariantumorigenesis through enhancing ACOT7 mRNA acetylation.Oncogene 43: 3498‑3516, 2024 144. Han Y, Fu L, Kong Y, Jiang C , Huang L, Zhang H: STEAP3 affects ovarian cancer progression by regulating ferroptosis through the p53/SLC7A11 pathway. Mediators Inflamm2024; 2024:4048527. 145. Luo L, Zhou H, Wang S, Pang M, Zhang J, Hu Y, You J. The application of nanoparticle‑based imaging and phototherapy for female reproductive organs diseases. Small2024; 20: e2207694 146. . Lee J, Jang S, Im J, Han Y, Kim S, Jo H, et al. Stearoyl‑CoA desaturase 1 inhibitioninduces ER stress‑mediated apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells.J Ovarian Res2024; 17: 73 147. Yan T, Ma X, Zhou K, Cao J, Tian Y, Zheng H,etal. A novel CSN5/CRT O‑GlcNAc/ERstress regulatory axis in platinum resistance of epithelial ovariancancer. Int J Biol Sci 2024;20: 1279‑1296. 148. Zhang M, Wang Y, Xu S, Huang S, Wu M, Chen G ,Wang Y.Endoplasmic reticulum stress‑related ten‑biomarker risk classifierfor survival evaluation in epithelial ovarian cancer andTRPM2: A potential therapeutic target of ovarian cancer. Int JMol Sci 2023; 24: 14010
-->